Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 24 results ...
Bryde, D J (2008) Is construction different? A comparison of perceptions of project management performance and practices by business sector and project type. Construction Management and Economics, 26(03), 315–27.
Chang, C-H, Lin, Y-C and Tserng, H P (2008) Distilling and managing engineers' experience in construction projects using a pattern approach. Construction Management and Economics, 26(03), 209–23.
Chen, C (2008) Entry mode selection for international construction markets: the influence of host country related factors. Construction Management and Economics, 26(03), 303–14.
Dean, Y and Warwick, S (1998) Building, the suppression of seasonal response and the effects on health. Building Research & Information, 26(03), 146–56.
Edwards, D, Parn, E A, Sing, M C and Thwala, W D (2019) Risk of excavators overturning. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 479–98.
Ekanayake, E, Shen, G and Kumaraswamy, M M (2019) Mapping the knowledge domains of value management: a bibliometric approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 499–514.
Galbraith, G H, McLean, R C and Guo, J S (1998) Moisture permeability data presented as a mathematical relationship. Building Research & Information, 26(03), 157–68.
Gan, X, Chang, R, Langston, C and Wen, T (2019) Exploring the interactions among factors impeding the diffusion of prefabricated building technologies. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 535–53.
Hasan, A and Jha, K N (2019) Client and contractor roles in schedule incentive/disincentive projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 386–407.
Juan, Y, Lin, I and Tsai, J (2019) A hybrid approach to optimize initial design strategies for pre-sale housing projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 515–34.
Matar, M M, Georgy, M E and Ibrahim, M E (2008) Sustainable construction management: introduction of the operational context space (OCS). Construction Management and Economics, 26(03), 261–75.
Newaz, M T, Davis, P R, Jefferies, M and Pillay, M (2019) Validation of an agent-specific safety climate model for construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 462–78.
Ng, S T and Tang, Z (2008) Delineating the predominant criteria for subcontractor appraisal and their latent relationships. Construction Management and Economics, 26(03), 249–59.
Ning, Y, Feng, M, Feng, J and Liu, X (2019) Understanding clients’ experience of trust and distrust in dwelling fit-out projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 444–61.
Shen, Q and Spedding, A (1998) Priority setting in planned maintenance: practical issues in using the multi-attribute approach. Building Research & Information, 26(03), 169–80.
Smallwood, J (1998) Client influence on contractor health and safety in South Africa. Building Research & Information, 26(03), 181–9.
Wanigarathna, N, Sherratt, F, Price, A and Austin, S (2019) Design re-use: critical application of healthcare building design evidence. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 350–66.
Wu, G, Zhao, X, Zuo, J and Zillante, G (2019) Effects of team diversity on project performance in construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 408–23.
Yeung, J F Y, Chan, A P C and Chan, D W M (2008) Establishing quantitative indicators for measuring the partnering performance of construction projects in Hong Kong. Construction Management and Economics, 26(03), 277–301.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: key performance indicators; partnering; quantitative indicators; delphi method; Hong Kong
- ISBN/ISSN: 0144-6193
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190701793688
- Abstract:
Research into Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for partnering projects in construction becomes vital because an increasing trend of client organizations has been observed to introduce a partnering approach to their building and construction works internationally during the last decade. A Partnering Performance Index (PPI) has been developed for construction projects in Hong Kong. The PPI can assist in developing a benchmark for measuring the performance of their partnering projects. However, it is worth noting that assessors may have their own semantic interpretations on each KPI. The aim of this paper is to establish suitable quantitative indicators (QIs) and reasonable quantitative ranges (QRs) for each KPI in order to avoid any possible discrepancies in interpreting the meaning of each KPI and provide objective evaluation results based on quantitative evidence. By conducting five structured face-to-face interviews and two rounds of a Delphi questionnaire survey in Hong Kong, a set of QIs were developed to measure the seven most important KPIs, including: (1) time performance; (2) cost performance; (3) top management commitment performance; (4) quality performance; (5) trust and respect performance; (6) effective communications performance; and (7) innovation and improvement performance. The identified QIs and QRs could assess and compare different partnering projects on a common basis objectively, thus helping to set a benchmark for measuring the performance level of partnering projects in Hong Kong. Construction senior executives and project managers can thus apply the QIs and QRs to measure, evaluate and improve the existing performance of their partnering projects in order to strive for construction excellence.
Yong, K T and Low, P S (2008) Organizational culture and TQM implementation in construction firms in Singapore. Construction Management and Economics, 26(03).
Zhang, L, Fenn, P and Fu, Y (2019) To insist or to concede? Contractors’ behavioural strategies when handling disputed claims. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 424–43.
Zhang, R, Xing, J, Ye, K, Lu, W and Shan, Y (2019) Synchronicity of global construction cost indexes. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 367–85.
Zhao, Z Y and Shen, L Y (2008) Are Chinese contractors competitive in international markets?. Construction Management and Economics, 26(03), 225–36.
Zhou, Y, Yang, Y and Yang, J (2019) Barriers to BIM implementation strategies in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 554–74.