Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 24 results ...
Bryde, D J (2008) Is construction different? A comparison of perceptions of project management performance and practices by business sector and project type. Construction Management and Economics, 26(03), 315–27.
Chang, C-H, Lin, Y-C and Tserng, H P (2008) Distilling and managing engineers' experience in construction projects using a pattern approach. Construction Management and Economics, 26(03), 209–23.
Chen, C (2008) Entry mode selection for international construction markets: the influence of host country related factors. Construction Management and Economics, 26(03), 303–14.
Dean, Y and Warwick, S (1998) Building, the suppression of seasonal response and the effects on health. Building Research & Information, 26(03), 146–56.
Edwards, D, Parn, E A, Sing, M C and Thwala, W D (2019) Risk of excavators overturning. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 479–98.
Ekanayake, E, Shen, G and Kumaraswamy, M M (2019) Mapping the knowledge domains of value management: a bibliometric approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 499–514.
Galbraith, G H, McLean, R C and Guo, J S (1998) Moisture permeability data presented as a mathematical relationship. Building Research & Information, 26(03), 157–68.
Gan, X, Chang, R, Langston, C and Wen, T (2019) Exploring the interactions among factors impeding the diffusion of prefabricated building technologies. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 535–53.
Hasan, A and Jha, K N (2019) Client and contractor roles in schedule incentive/disincentive projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 386–407.
Juan, Y, Lin, I and Tsai, J (2019) A hybrid approach to optimize initial design strategies for pre-sale housing projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 515–34.
Matar, M M, Georgy, M E and Ibrahim, M E (2008) Sustainable construction management: introduction of the operational context space (OCS). Construction Management and Economics, 26(03), 261–75.
Newaz, M T, Davis, P R, Jefferies, M and Pillay, M (2019) Validation of an agent-specific safety climate model for construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 462–78.
Ng, S T and Tang, Z (2008) Delineating the predominant criteria for subcontractor appraisal and their latent relationships. Construction Management and Economics, 26(03), 249–59.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: subcontractor; performance appraisal; decision criteria; factor analysis
- ISBN/ISSN: 0144-6193
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190701874405
- Abstract:
An industry report in Hong Kong calls for an agreed framework for appraising subcontractor performance. A set of performance appraisal criteria is developed that is agreeable to all key stakeholders in subcontracting. By examining the criteria being applied around the world and reviewing the available literature, a set of 31 subcontractor performance appraisal criteria was compiled. A questionnaire survey was conducted in Hong Kong to reveal the perception of relevant stakeholders on the most critical criteria for subcontractor appraisal. The independent samples t-test confirmed that the main contractor and subcontractor groups had a significant agreement on the importance levels of most subcontractor performance appraisal criteria. Through factor analysis, the 15 most important subcontractor performance appraisal criteria and their underlying relationships are identified. The results indicate that the three overarching factors for subcontractor performance appraisal are 'team interaction', 'accomplishment of project goals' and 'track record'. The identified appraisal criteria lay a solid foundation for the development of a centralized subcontractor performance appraisal system to facilitate performance reporting, data sharing and benchmarking.
Ning, Y, Feng, M, Feng, J and Liu, X (2019) Understanding clients’ experience of trust and distrust in dwelling fit-out projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 444–61.
Shen, Q and Spedding, A (1998) Priority setting in planned maintenance: practical issues in using the multi-attribute approach. Building Research & Information, 26(03), 169–80.
Smallwood, J (1998) Client influence on contractor health and safety in South Africa. Building Research & Information, 26(03), 181–9.
Wanigarathna, N, Sherratt, F, Price, A and Austin, S (2019) Design re-use: critical application of healthcare building design evidence. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 350–66.
Wu, G, Zhao, X, Zuo, J and Zillante, G (2019) Effects of team diversity on project performance in construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 408–23.
Yeung, J F Y, Chan, A P C and Chan, D W M (2008) Establishing quantitative indicators for measuring the partnering performance of construction projects in Hong Kong. Construction Management and Economics, 26(03), 277–301.
Yong, K T and Low, P S (2008) Organizational culture and TQM implementation in construction firms in Singapore. Construction Management and Economics, 26(03).
Zhang, L, Fenn, P and Fu, Y (2019) To insist or to concede? Contractors’ behavioural strategies when handling disputed claims. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 424–43.
Zhang, R, Xing, J, Ye, K, Lu, W and Shan, Y (2019) Synchronicity of global construction cost indexes. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 367–85.
Zhao, Z Y and Shen, L Y (2008) Are Chinese contractors competitive in international markets?. Construction Management and Economics, 26(03), 225–36.
Zhou, Y, Yang, Y and Yang, J (2019) Barriers to BIM implementation strategies in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(03), 554–74.