ARCOM

Search or browse again, or refine search.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 18 results ...

Amadi, C, Carrillo, P and Tuuli, M (2019) PPP projects: improvements in stakeholder management. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(02), 544–60.

Amadi, C, Carrillo, P and Tuuli, M (2018) Stakeholder management in PPP projects: external stakeholders’ perspective. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(04), 403–14.

Amadi, C, Carrillo, P and Tuuli, M (2014) Stakeholder management in public private partnership projects in Nigeria: Towards a research agenda. In: Raiden, A and Aboagye-Nimo, E (Eds.), Proceedings 30th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2014, Portsmouth, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 423–32.

Blay, K B, Tuuli, M M and France-Mensah, J (2019) Managing change in BIM-Level 2 projects: benefits, challenges, and opportunities. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(05), 581–96.

Gunathilaka S, Tuuli M M and Dainty A R J (2013) Critical analysis of research on project success in construction management journals. In: Smith, S D and Ahiaga-Dagbui, D D (Eds.), Proceedings 29th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2013, Reading, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 979–988.

Koh T Y, Tuuli M M and Rowlinson S (2013) A relational approach to high reliability organising for construction project safety: a conceptual framework. In: Smith, S D and Ahiaga-Dagbui, D D (Eds.), Proceedings 29th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2013, Reading, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 369–379.

• Type: Conference Proceedings
• Keywords: health and safety, high reliability organising, human factor, project management, social capital
• ISBN/ISSN: 978-0-9552390-7-6
• URL: http://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/proceedings/ar2013-0369-0379_Koh_Tuuli_Rowlinson.pdf
• Abstract:
  In Hong Kong, current safety management regimes in the construction industry are largely based on compliance, error detection and prevention, and safety climate intervention. While these approaches have improved construction project safety performance, significant limitations still exist. First, compliance and error detection/prevention approaches are based on rigid and ideal formulations of construction work processes. Second, safety climate interventionist approaches have a limitation of mixing psychological and human factors issues that are somehow detached from construction work contextual consideration. As a result, current safety management approaches are less effective in ensuring safety in construction operations which are emergent and dynamically complex. These situations require adaptive human inputs and interactions to ensure safety on projects that are grounded in the social capital among project team members. However, as social capital is a primordial feature of human interactions that is likely to lie dormant, its impact on safety performance is likely to be indirect and mediated by some organising processes such as high reliability organising (HRO) processes. Adopting the systems view of safety, we draw on these concepts to highlight the relational aspects in the management of construction project safety, and explain how these relational aspects can contribute to improving project safety. We accomplish these objectives by putting forth a conceptual framework and methodological suggestion.

Liu, A M M, Fellows, R and Tuuli, M M (2011) The role of corporate citizenship values in promoting corporate social performance: towards a conceptual model and a research agenda. Construction Management and Economics, 29(02), 173–83.

Sackey, E, Tuuli, M and Dainty, A (2019) Expansive learning in contemporary construction organisations. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(03), 383–98.

Tuuli, M and Acquah, S (2012) Do you feel what I feel? Empowerment contagion in project teams. In: Smith, S.D (Ed.), Proceedings 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 563–74.

Tuuli, M M (2009) Empowerment and control dynamics in project teams: a multilevel examination of the antecedents and jobperformance consequences, Unpublished PhD Thesis, , University of Hong Kong.

Tuuli, M M and Koh, S R T Y (2009) Portfolio of control modes in project teams: A Hong Kong case study. In: Dainty, A R J (Ed.), Proceedings 25th Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2009, Nottingham, UK. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Vol. 2, 927–37.

Tuuli, M M and Rowlinson, S (2009) Empowerment in project teams: a multilevel examination of the job performance implications. Construction Management and Economics, 27(05), 473–98.

Tuuli, M M and Rowlinson, S (2010) Impact of leadership style and team context on psychological empowerment in construction project teams. In: Egbu, C (Ed.), Proceedings 26th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-8 September 2010, Leeds, UK. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Vol. 1, 411–20.

Tuuli, M M and Rowlinson, S (2009) Performance Consequences of Psychological Empowerment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(12), 1334–47.

Tuuli, M M and Rowlinson, S (2007) Towards a conceptual framework of empowerment and job performance in project teams. In: Boyd, D (Ed.), Proceedings 23rd Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2007, Belfast, UK. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Vol. 1, 3–12.

Tuuli, M M and Rowlinson, S (2010) What empowers individuals and teams in project settings? A critical incident analysis. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 17(01), 20.

Tuuli, M M, Rowlinson, S and Koh, T Y (2010) Control modes and mechanisms in construction project teams: drivers and consequences. Construction Management and Economics, 28(05), 451–65.

Tuuli, M M, Rowlinson, S and Koh, T Y (2010) Dynamics of control in construction project teams. Construction Management and Economics, 28(02), 202.