Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 32 results ...

Adams, F K (2006) Expert elicitation and Bayesian analysis of construction contract risks: an investigation. Construction Management and Economics, 24(01), 81-96.

Aibinu, A A (2006) The relationship between distribution of control, fairness and potential for dispute in the claims handling process. Construction Management and Economics, 24(01), 45-54.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Claims; delay and disruption claims; claims process; control; fairness; dispute
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0144-6193
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010500226954
  • Abstract:

    Parties’ concern for fairness has been identified as one of the underlying causes of dissatisfaction and protracted dispute in the process for handling contractors’ claims. Social psychology literature suggests that distribution of control over the various stages of any conflict resolution process is a factor that may influence concern for fairness. Despite the numerous studies in social psychology and management research, little or no attempt has been made to systematically investigate how distribution of control over the various stages of the process for handling a contractor’s claims for delay and disruption could influence concern for fairness and potential for dispute. This should be a useful exercise in that it would suggest ways of reducing potential for disputes in construction project delivery. This study is an attempt to fill this research gap. Drawing on social psychology theory, this study proposes that, in order to enhance perceived fairness and thereby reduce potential for dispute, (1) the claims certifier needs to exercise a higher degree of process and content control over the early stages of process for handling claims than the control exercised by the employer and contractor; (2) the claims certifier must exercise total decision control so as to enhance the perceived impartiality and neutrality of the decision rendered on the claims. By examining two litigated cases, the study illustrates the relationship between distribution of control, perceived lack of fairness and dispute potential. By adopting the proposed principle for distributing control into the claims handling process and coupled with the use of an independent claims certifier, potential for dispute could be reduced on construction projects.

Andi (2006) The importance and allocation of risks in Indonesian construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 24(01), 69-80.

Arif, M, Al Zubi, M, Gupta, A D, Egbu, C, Walton, R O and Islam, R (2017) Knowledge sharing maturity model for Jordanian construction sector. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(01), 170-88.

Asiedu, R O, Frempong, N K and Alfen, H W (2017) Predicting likelihood of cost overrun in educational projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(01), 21-39.

Assaf, S A and Barhamain, S Y (1996) Factors affecting construction practices in Makkah Al-Mukkaramah, Saudi Arabia. Building Research & Information, 24(01), 27–30.

Assaf, S A, Al-Musallami, A I and Shash, A A (1996) Professional architectural/engineering consultancy practices in Saudi Arabia. Building Research & Information, 24(01), 59–62.

Bubshait, A A, Tahir, B M and Jannadi, M O (1996) Use of microsilica in concrete construction. Building Research & Information, 24(01), 41–9.

Chang-Richards, Y, Wilkinson, S, Seville, E and Brunsdon, D (2017) Effects of a major disaster on skills shortages in the construction industry: Lessons learned from New Zealand. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(01), 2-20.

Dann, N, Hills, S and Worthing, D (2006) Assessing how organizations approach the maintenance management of listed buildings. Construction Management and Economics, 24(01), 97-104.

Davies, K, McMeel, D J and Wilkinson, S (2017) Making friends with Frankenstein: Hybrid practice in BIM. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(01), 78-93.

Dawood, N and Sriprasert, E (2006) Construction scheduling using multi-constraint and genetic algorithms approach. Construction Management and Economics, 24(01), 19-30.

De Silva, G, Perera, B and Rodrigo, M (2019) Adaptive reuse of buildings: the case of Sri Lanka. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 24(01), 79–96.

Enshassi, A (1996) Materials control and waste on building sites. Building Research & Information, 24(01), 31–4.

Friedman, A and Cammalleri, V (1996) The impact of R-2000 building technology on Canadian housing. Building Research & Information, 24(01), 5–13.

Huang, Y C (2006) Graphical-based multistage scheduling method for RC buildings. Construction Management and Economics, 24(01), 5-18.

K.V., P, V., V, R., V and Bhat, N (2019) Analysis of causes of delay in Indian construction projects and mitigation measures. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 24(01), 58–78.

Kärnä, S and Junnonen, J-M (2017) Designers’ performance evaluation in construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(01), 154-69.

Kalutara, P, Zhang, G, Setunge, S and Wakefield, R (2017) Factors that influence Australian community buildings’ sustainable management. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(01), 94-117.

Leung, M-Y, Liu, A M M and Wong, M M-k (2006) Impact of stress-coping behaviour on estimation performance. Construction Management and Economics, 24(01), 55-67.

Lu, W, Hua, Y and Zhang, S (2017) Logistic regression analysis for factors influencing cost performance of design-bid-build and design-build projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(01), 118-32.

Lu, W, Li, Z and Wang, S (2017) The role of justice for cooperation and contract’s moderating effect in construction dispute negotiation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(01), 133-53.

Mbachu, J and Nkado, R (2006) Conceptual framework for assessment of client needs and satisfaction in the building development process. Construction Management and Economics, 24(01), 31-44.

Osei-Kyei, R, Chan, A P, Yao, Y and Mazher, K M (2019) Conflict prevention measures for public–private partnerships in developing countries. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 24(01), 39–57.

Santoso, D S and Bourpanus, N (2019) Moving to e-bidding. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 24(01), 2–18.

Sarkar, A, Godbole, P N and Chakrabarti, S C (1996) Potential for expert systems in the assessment and repair of fire damaged buildings in India. Building Research & Information, 24(01), 51–8.

Semaan, N and Salem, M (2017) A deterministic contractor selection decision-support system for competitive bidding. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(01), 61-77.

Shahtaheri, M, Haas, C T and Salimi, T (2017) A multi-dimensional joint confidence limit approach to mixed mode planning for round-the-clock projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(01), 40-60.

Singla, H K and Samanta, P K (2019) Determinants of dividend payout of construction companies: a panel data analysis. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 24(01), 19–38.

Thomas, H R, Rees, S W and Lloyd, R M (1996) Measured heat losses through a real ground floor slab. Building Research & Information, 24(01), 15–26.

Velho Júnior, V E, Costa Melo, I, Alves Junior, P N and Rebelatto, D A d N (2019) Analysis of real estate management of lease service agreements by the public sector of a Latin American metropolis. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction , 24(01), 97–122.

Wild, S (1996) Observations on the use of ground waste clay brick as a cement replacement material. Building Research & Information, 24(01), 35–40.