ARCOM

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 30 results ...

Aalto, L, Sirola, P, Kalliomäki-Levanto, T, Lahtinen, M, Ruohomäki, V, Salonen, H and Reijula, K (2019) User-centric work environments in modular healthcare facilities. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(06), 1047–62.

Chapman, C and Ward, S (2008) Developing and implementing a balanced incentive and risk sharing contract. Construction Management and Economics, 26(06), 659–69.

Chinyio, E and Akintoye, A (2008) Practical approaches for engaging stakeholders: findings from the UK. Construction Management and Economics, 26(06), 591–9.

Daniel, E I and Pasquire, C (2019) Creating social value within the delivery of construction projects: the role of lean approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(06), 1105–28.

Du, J, Wang, Q and Shi, Q (2019) Description–experience gap under imperfect information. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(06), 1151–70.

Edwards, P and Bowen, P (2019) Language and communication issues in HIV/AIDS intervention management in the South African construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(06), 962–88.

Fraser, C and Zhu, C (2008) Stakeholder perception of construction site managers' effectiveness. Construction Management and Economics, 26(06), 579–90.

Galbraith, G H, McLean, R C, Gillespie, I, Guo, J S and Kelly, D (1998) Non-isothermal moisture diffusion in porous building materials. Building Research & Information, 26(06), 330–9.

Layzell, J and Ledbetter, S (1998) FMEA applied to cladding systems: reducing the risk of failure. Building Research & Information, 26(06), 351–7.

Li, H, Love, P E D and Ogunlana, S (1998) Genetic algorithm compared to non-linear optimization for labour and equipment assignment. Building Research & Information, 26(06), 322–9.

Li, L, Li, Z, Li, X and Wu, G (2019) A review of global lean construction during the past two decades: analysis and visualization. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(06), 1192–216.

Lingard, H, Zhang, R P and Oswald, D (2019) Effect of leadership and communication practices on the safety climate and behaviour of construction workgroups. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(06), 886–906.

• Type: Journal Article
• Keywords: Management; Questionnaire survey; Construction safety; Leadership; Communication; Safety climate;
• ISBN/ISSN: 0969-9988
• URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2018-0015
• Abstract:
  The leadership style and communication practices of supervisors in the Australian construction industry were measured. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of leadership style and communication practices of Australian construction supervisors on workgroup health and safety (H&S) climate and behaviour. A questionnaire was administered to members of 20 workgroups engaged in rail construction work on the Level Crossing Removal Project and the Melbourne Metro Tunnel Project in Victoria, Australia. The survey measured components of supervisors’ transformational and transactional leadership, communication practices, the group H&S climate and workers’ self-reported H&S compliance and participation. Supervisors’ transformational and transactional leadership, as well as communication practices, were all positively and significantly correlated with group H&S climate and workers’ self-reported H&S behaviours. The transformational leadership component of providing an appropriate model was the strongest predictor of H&S participation, while H&S compliance was predicted by the transactional leadership component of providing contingent reward, as well as supervisors’ communication practices. H&S climate fully mediated the relationship between supervisory leadership and workers’ self-reported H&S behaviour. The research demonstrates that both transformational and transactional supervisory leadership are important in the construction context. Effective communication between supervisors and workers is also important for H&S. The findings suggest that supervisory leadership development programmes may be an effective way to improve H&S performance in predominantly subcontracted construction workgroups.

Mathur, V N, Price, A and Austin, S (2008) Conceptualizing stakeholder engagement in the context of sustainability and its assessment. Construction Management and Economics, 26(06), 601–9.

Moodley, K, Smith, N and Preece, C N (2008) Stakeholder matrix for ethical relationships in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 26(06), 625–32.

Munir, M, Kiviniemi, A and Jones, S W (2019) Business value of integrated BIM-based asset management. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(06), 1171–91.

Ngowi, A B (1998) Is construction procurement a key to sustainable development?. Building Research & Information, 26(06), 340–50.

Olander, S and Landin, A (2008) A comparative study of factors affecting the external stakeholder management process. Construction Management and Economics, 26(06), 553–61.

Rowlinson, S and Cheung, Y K F (2008) Stakeholder management through empowerment: modelling project success. Construction Management and Economics, 26(06), 611–23.

Seadon, J and Tookey, J E (2019) Drivers for construction productivity. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(06), 945–61.

Shalaby, A and Hassanein, A (2019) A decision support system (DSS) for facilitating the scenario selection process of the renegotiation of PPP contracts. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(06), 1004–23.

Shrestha, K, Shrestha, P P and Lidder, M (2019) Life-cycle cost comparison of chip seal and striping: in-house workers versus private contractors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(06), 927–44.

Shrestha, P P, Shrestha, K K and Zeleke, H B (2019) Probability of change orders and the effect on cost and schedule for new public school buildings. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(06), 1087–104.

Shurrab, J, Hussain, M and Khan, M (2019) Green and sustainable practices in the construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(06), 1063–86.

Smyth, H (2008) The credibility gap in stakeholder management: ethics and evidence of relationship management. Construction Management and Economics, 26(06), 633–43.

Walker, D, Bourne, L M and Shelley, A (2008) Influence, stakeholder mapping and visualization. Construction Management and Economics, 26(06), 645–58.

Wang, Q and Shi, Q (2019) The incentive mechanism of knowledge sharing in the industrial construction supply chain based on a supervisory mechanism. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(06), 989–1003.

Ward, S and Chapman, C (2008) Stakeholders and uncertainty management in projects. Construction Management and Economics, 26(06), 563–77.

Yalcinkaya, M and Singh, V (2019) Exploring the use of Gestalt’s principles in improving the visualization, user experience and comprehension of COBie data extension. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(06), 1024–46.

Zhu, F, Sun, M, Wang, L, Sun, X and Yu, M (2019) Value conflicts between local government and private sector in stock public-private partnership projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(06), 907–26.

Zohrehvandi, S and Khalilzadeh, M (2019) APRT-FMEA buffer sizing method in scheduling of a wind farm construction project. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(06), 1129–50.