Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 8 results ...

Gillich, A, Sunikka-Blank, M and Ford, A (2017) Lessons for the UK green deal from the US BBNP. Building Research & Information, 45(04), 384-95.

Goulden, S, Erell, E, Garb, Y and Pearlmutter, D (2017) Green building standards as socio-technical actors in municipal environmental policy. Building Research & Information, 45(04), 414-25.

Gram-Hanssen, K, Heidenstrøm, N, Vittersø, G, Madsen, L V and Jacobsen, M H (2017) Selling and installing heat pumps: Influencing household practices. Building Research & Information, 45(04), 359-70.

Guerra-Santin, O and Silvester, S (2017) Development of Dutch occupancy and heating profiles for building simulation. Building Research & Information, 45(04), 396-413.

Haddad, S, Osmond, P and King, S (2017) Revisiting thermal comfort models in Iranian classrooms during the warm season. Building Research & Information, 45(04), 457-73.

Moore, T, Ridley, I, Strengers, Y, Maller, C and Horne, R (2017) Dwelling performance and adaptive summer comfort in low-income Australian households. Building Research & Information, 45(04), 443-56.

Wade, F, Shipworth, M and Hitchings, R (2017) How installers select and explain domestic heating controls. Building Research & Information, 45(04), 371-83.

Wallhagen, M, Malmqvist, T and Eriksson, O (2017) Professionals' knowledge and use of environmental assessment in an architectural competition. Building Research & Information, 45(04), 426-42.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: environmental assessment; assessment tool; architectural competition; sustainable design; architects; neighbourhood; urban design; knowledge; sustainable construction; life-cycle assessment; perspective; assessment tools; drivers; trends; green; of-the-ar
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0961-3218
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2015.1118264
  • Abstract:
    In early design phases, architects, landscape architects and urban planners are key actors whose decisions determine the environmental impact of planning and building projects. Environmental and sustainability assessment tools for buildings and neighbourhoods have been developed to promote sustainable building, but their usage has not been thoroughly evaluated. This study investigated self-reported knowledge and usage of such tools among competitors and jury group from 10 European countries involved in the international architectural competition '€~A New City Centre for Kiruna'€TM in Sweden. The questionnaire revealed that 13% used environmental assessment tools or management systems in the competition, although 47% had used them previously. Tool users reported greater knowledge of how to handle environmental impacts than non-users. However, the self-rated experience of handling various environmental impacts, in the competition and in general, was low for both groups. Nevertheless, the self-rated importance of environmental impacts was high among all participants. Based on this study, it is concluded that environmental assessment tools, issues and goals can be better integrated into the processes of early design in planning and building projects, and in architectural competitions. Furthermore, to limit environmental impacts in building and planning projects, professionals need to be educated about environmental strategies and solutions.;In early design phases, architects, landscape architects and urban planners are key actors whose decisions determine the environmental impact of planning and building projects. Environmental and sustainability assessment tools for buildings and neighbourhoods have been developed to promote sustainable building, but their usage has not been thoroughly evaluated. This study investigated self-reported knowledge and usage of such tools among competitors and jury group from 10 European countries involved in the international architectural competition 'A New City Centre for Kiruna' in Sweden. The questionnaire revealed that 13% used environmental assessment tools or management systems in the competition, although 47% had used them previously. Tool users reported greater knowledge of how to handle environmental impacts than non-users. However, the self-rated experience of handling various environmental impacts, in the competition and in general, was low for both groups. Nevertheless, the self-rated importance of environmental impacts was high among all participants. Based on this study, it is concluded that environmental assessment tools, issues and goals can be better integrated into the processes of early design in planning and building projects, and in architectural competitions. Furthermore, to limit environmental impacts in building and planning projects, professionals need to be educated about environmental strategies and solutions.;In early design phases, architects, landscape architects and urban planners are key actors whose decisions determine the environmental impact of planning and building projects. Environmental and sustainability assessment tools for buildings and neighbourhoods have been developed to promote sustainable building, but their usage has not been thoroughly evaluated. This study investigated self-reported knowledge and usage of such tools among competitors and jury group from 10 European countries involved in the international architectural competition 'A New City Centre for Kiruna' in Sweden. The questionnaire revealed that 13% used environmental assessment tools or management systems in the competition, although 47% had used them previously. Tool users reported greater knowledge of how to handle environmental impacts than non-users. However, the self-rated experience of handling various environmental impacts, in the competition and in general, was low for both groups. Nevertheless, the self-rated importance of environmental impacts was high among all participants. Based on this study, it is concluded that environmental assessment tools, issues and goals ca be better integrated into the processes of early design in planning and building projects, and in architectural competitions. Furthermore, to limit environmental impacts in building and planning projects, professionals need to be educated about environmental strategies and solutions.;In early design phases, architects, landscape architects and urban planners are key actors whose decisions determine the environmental impact of planning and building projects. Environmental and sustainability assessment tools for buildings and neighbourhoods have been developed to promote sustainable building, but their usage has not been thoroughly evaluated. This study investigated self-reported knowledge and usage of such tools among competitors and jury group from 10 European countries involved in the international architectural competition A New City Centre for Kiruna' in Sweden. The questionnaire revealed that 13% used environmental assessment tools or management systems in the competition, although 47% had used them previously. Tool users reported greater knowledge of how to handle environmental impacts than non-users. However, the self-rated experience of handling various environmental impacts, in the competition and in general, was low for both groups. Nevertheless, the self-rated importance of environmental impacts was high among all participants. Based on this study, it is concluded that environmental assessment tools, issues and goals can be better integrated into the processes of early design in planning and building projects, and in architectural competitions. Furthermore, to limit environmental impacts in building and planning projects, professionals need to be educated about environmental strategies and solutions.;