ARCOM

Abstracts – Browse Results

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 19 results ...

Campagnac, E (1998) National system of innovation in France: Plan Construction et Architecture. Building Research & Information, 26(05), 297–301.

Type: Journal Article
Keywords: construction industry; France; housing; innovation; public policy; research policy; research organization
ISBN/ISSN: 0961-3218
URL: http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/link.asp?id=ubp5jafgppx4w6pk
Abstract:
This paper presents the French system of innovation in the construction sector, and points out its strengths and its weaknesses, through the analysis of a specific institution: Plan Construction et Architecture (PCA). The originality of PCA is its capacity to encourage innovation by experimentation. PCA mobilizes all the representatives of the construction sector (clients, professionals, contractors, etc.) to conceive and work together on innovation, through 'Realisations Experimentales' (REX). Independent researchers provide expertise and evaluate the results of these experimentations. This paper points out the major lessons which can be drawn for this system.

de Valence, G (2019) Reframing construction within the built environment sector. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(05), 740–5.

Fulford, R G (2019) The implications of the construction industry to national wealth. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(05), 779–93.

Gann, D M, Wang, Y and Hawkins, R (1998) Do regulations encourage innovation? The case of energy efficiency in housing. Building Research & Information, 26(05), 280–96.

Gonzalez-Ruiz, J D, Arboleda, A, Botero, S and Rojo, J (2019) Investment valuation model for sustainable infrastructure systems. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(05), 850–84.

Haji Karimian, S, Mbachu, J, Egbelakin, T and Shahzad, W (2019) Improving efficiency in roading projects: a New Zealand study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(05), 827–49.

Haugbølle, K, Larsen, J N and Nielsen, J (2019) Construction productivity revisited: towards measuring performance of construction output. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(05), 794–813.

Ilhan, B and Yobas, B (2019) Measuring construction for social, economic and environmental assessment. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(05), 746–65.

Lam, K-C, Lam, M C-K and Wang, D (2008) MBNQA_oriented self_assessment quality management system for contractors: fuzzy AHP approach. Construction Management and Economics, 26(05), 447-61.

Lopes, J P, Oliveira, R A and Abreu, M I (2019) Estimating the built environment stock in Cape Verde. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(05), 814–26.

Nyström, J (2008) A quasi_experimental evaluation of partnering. Construction Management and Economics, 26(05), 531-41.

Pantouvakis, J-P and Manoliadis, O G (2008) A compromise programming model for site selection of borrow pits. Construction Management and Economics, 26(05), 433-46.

Rameezdeen, R and Ramachandra, T (2008) Construction linkages in a developing economy: the case of Sri Lanka. Construction Management and Economics, 26(05), 499-506.

Ruddock, L and Ruddock, S (2019) Wealth measurement and the role of built asset investment: an empirical comparison. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(05), 766–78.

Ye, K, Jiang, W and Shen, L (2008) Project competition intensity (PCI) in the construction market: a case study in China. Construction Management and Economics, 26(05), 463-70.