Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 19 results ...

Abdel Aziz, A M (2008) Minimum performance bounds for evaluating contractors performance during construction of highway pavement projects. Construction Management and Economics, 26(05), 507-29.

Bee Hua, G (2008) The state of applications of quantitative analysis techniques to construction economics and management (1983 to 2006). Construction Management and Economics, 26(05), 485-97.

Campagnac, E (1998) National system of innovation in France: Plan Construction et Architecture. Building Research & Information, 26(05), 297–301.

de Valence, G (2019) Reframing construction within the built environment sector. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(05), 740–5.

Fulford, R G (2019) The implications of the construction industry to national wealth. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(05), 779–93.

Gann, D M, Wang, Y and Hawkins, R (1998) Do regulations encourage innovation? The case of energy efficiency in housing. Building Research & Information, 26(05), 280–96.

Gonzalez-Ruiz, J D, Arboleda, A, Botero, S and Rojo, J (2019) Investment valuation model for sustainable infrastructure systems. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(05), 850–84.

Haji Karimian, S, Mbachu, J, Egbelakin, T and Shahzad, W (2019) Improving efficiency in roading projects: a New Zealand study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(05), 827–49.

Haugbølle, K, Larsen, J N and Nielsen, J (2019) Construction productivity revisited: towards measuring performance of construction output. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(05), 794–813.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Organization; Innovation; Process; Value management; Management; Productivity;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0969-9988
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2018-0094
  • Abstract:
    Construction is repeatedly criticised for its low productivity based on statistical data that do not represent the output of construction adequately. The purpose of this paper is to improve the understanding of construction output – being the numerator in construction productivity calculations – by focussing on changes in quantity of the products, product characteristics and composition of the aggregate rather than as changes in price. Design/methodology/approach The research design of this study applies statistical data from the national accounts along with data from four paradigmatic case studies of social housing projects covering a period of 50 years. Findings The results indicate that while construction output prices have increased threefold over the past 50 years, improvements in performance can only explain approximately 20 per cent. Research limitations/implications The developed four-step method has demonstrated its value as a means to measure changes in the characteristics of the product, but more studies on the actual figures and results over time and regions are required before solid conclusions can be drawn. Social implications This study has added new knowledge of construction output that supports the development of a more accurate construction statistics, which in turn can assist the design of more effective and evidence-based policies for improving construction productivity. Originality/value This paper describes and demonstrates a novel performance-based methodology for addressing changes in the characteristics of the products in a longitudinally perspective, which can potentially provide a better understanding of changes in productivity.

Ilhan, B and Yobas, B (2019) Measuring construction for social, economic and environmental assessment. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(05), 746–65.

Lam, K-C, Lam, M C-K and Wang, D (2008) MBNQA_oriented self_assessment quality management system for contractors: fuzzy AHP approach. Construction Management and Economics, 26(05), 447-61.

Lopes, J P, Oliveira, R A and Abreu, M I (2019) Estimating the built environment stock in Cape Verde. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(05), 814–26.

Mbachu, J (2008) Conceptual framework for the assessment of subcontractors' eligibility and performance in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 26(05), 471-84.

Nyström, J (2008) A quasi_experimental evaluation of partnering. Construction Management and Economics, 26(05), 531-41.

Pantouvakis, J-P and Manoliadis, O G (2008) A compromise programming model for site selection of borrow pits. Construction Management and Economics, 26(05), 433-46.

Rameezdeen, R and Ramachandra, T (2008) Construction linkages in a developing economy: the case of Sri Lanka. Construction Management and Economics, 26(05), 499-506.

Ruddock, L and Ruddock, S (2019) Wealth measurement and the role of built asset investment: an empirical comparison. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(05), 766–78.

Winch, G (1998) Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction. Building Research & Information, 26(05), 268–79.

Ye, K, Jiang, W and Shen, L (2008) Project competition intensity (PCI) in the construction market: a case study in China. Construction Management and Economics, 26(05), 463-70.