Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 8 results ...

Hartog, L, Weijs-Perrée, M and Appel-Meulenbroek, R (2018) The influence of personality on user satisfaction: multi-tenant offices. Building Research & Information, 46(04), 402–16.

Ioannidou, D, Zerbi, S, García de Soto, B and Habert, G (2018) Where does the money go? Economic flow analysis of construction projects. Building Research & Information, 46(04), 348–66.

Jack, R, Loveday, D, Allinson, D and Lomas, K (2018) First evidence for the reliability of building co-heating tests. Building Research & Information, 46(04), 383–401.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: co-heating; energy performance; heat transfer; heat-transfer coefficient; houses; {[}in-situ{]}; performance gap; performance assessment;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0961-3218
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1299523
  • Abstract:
    This paper provides powerful evidence empirically demonstrating for the first time the reliability of the co-heating test. The test is widely used throughout Europe to measure the total heat transfer through the fabric of buildings and to calculate the heat-transfer coefficient (HTC; units W/K). A reliable test is essential to address the ‘performance gap’, where in-use energy performance is consistently, and often substantially, poorer than predicted. The co-heating test could meet this need, but its reliability requires confirmation. Seven teams independently conducted co-heating tests on the same detached house near Watford, UK. Despite differences in the weather and in the experimental and analytical approaches, the teams’ final reported HTC measurements were within ±10% of the mean. With further standardization it is likely to be possible to improve upon this reproducibility. Furthermore, uncertainty analysis based upon a 95% confidence interval resulted in an estimated uncertainty in HTC measurements of ±8%. This research addresses persistent doubts about the reliability of the co-heating test. Avenues to further improvement of the test are discussed. This work helps to enable the test’s wider adoption as a component of the regulatory process and thus improvements to standards of house construction.

Kristjansdottir, T F, Heeren, N, Andresen, I and Brattebø, H (2018) Comparative emission analysis of low-energy and zero-emission buildings. Building Research & Information, 46(04), 367–82.

Lorch, R (2018) End of an era. Building Research & Information, 46(04), 343–7.

Meacham, B J and van Straalen, I J (2018) A socio-technical system framework for risk-informed performance-based building regulation. Building Research & Information, 46(04), 444–62.

Parkinson, A T, Reid, R, McKerrow, H and Wright, D (2018) Evaluating positivist theories of occupant satisfaction: a statistical analysis. Building Research & Information, 46(04), 430–43.

Pekkonen, M, Turunen, M and Haverinen-Shaughnessy, U (2018) Housing quality perceptions in Finland: the elderly population. Building Research & Information, 46(04), 417–29.