Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 13 results ...

Cole, R J (2012) Transitioning from green to regenerative design. Building Research & Information, 40(01), 39–53.

Cole, R J, Busby, P, Guenther, R, Briney, L, Blaviesciunaite, A and Alencar, T (2012) A regenerative design framework: setting new aspirations and initiating new discussions. Building Research & Information, 40(01), 95–111.

du Plessis, C (2012) Towards a regenerative paradigm for the built environment. Building Research & Information, 40(01), 7–22.

Ehwi, R J, Oti-Sarpong, K, Shojaei, R and Burgess, G (2022) Offsite Manufacturing Research: A Systematic Review of Methodologies Used. Construction Management and Economics, 40(01), 1–24.

Ekeskär, A, Havenvid, & I, Karrbom Gustavsson, T and Eriksson, P E (2022) Construction logistics in a multi-project context: coopetition among main contractors and the role of third-party logistics providers. Construction Management and Economics, 40(01), 25–40.

Hoxie, C, Berkebile, R and Todd, J A (2012) Stimulating regenerative development through community dialogue. Building Research & Information, 40(01), 65–80.

Järvenpää, A, Eriksson, P E and Larsson, J (2022) Exploring a public client’s control systems in infrastructure projects from a relationship history perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 40(01), 56–71.

Mang, P and Reed, B (2012) Designing from place: a regenerative framework and methodology. Building Research & Information, 40(01), 23–38.

Plaut, J M, Dunbar, B, Wackerman, A and Hodgin, S (2012) Regenerative design: the LENSES Framework for buildings and communities. Building Research & Information, 40(01), 112–22.

Styhre, A, Brorström, S and Gluch, P (2022) The valuation of housing in low-amenity and low purchasing power city districts: social and economic value entangled by default. Construction Management and Economics, 40(01), 72–86.

Svec, P, Berkebile, R and Todd, J A (2012) REGEN: toward a tool for regenerative thinking. Building Research & Information, 40(01), 81–94.

Svensson, I and Gluch, P (2022) Materiality in action: the role of objects in institutional work. Construction Management and Economics, 40(01), 41–55.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Institutional work; materiality; public organizations; renovation;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0144-6193
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2021.2014063
  • Abstract:
    Public property owners currently face a great backlog of renovation work at the same time as there is a need to build new, increase cost-efficiency, and comply with new environmental regulations on energy efficiency. To manage these challenges many public property owners have initiated change processes to develop new strategic ways of working with their properties, often aligned with a project portfolio approach. This involves a quite radical shift of practices in these organizations, which requires individuals to engage in institutional work. Recent studies have highlighted how institutional work is shared between humans and objects. To increase understanding of objects’ role in institutional work through which public property owners develop new practices that support a holistic, long-term, and sustainable property management, we analyzed observational data of strategy project meetings in three Swedish public property owner organizations. Findings show how objects have an active role in institutional work through acts of attacking, justifying, and/or safeguarding to maintain, create and/or disrupt institutions. Objects take on multiple roles and both unite and divide human actors as well as evoke emotions that guide actions. Three types of agency are highlighted: relational, discursive, and emotional. Increased knowledge on the role of objects in institutional work and how objects (can) influence human agency assists actors in making better-informed decisions in strategic change processes.

Zari, M P (2012) Ecosystem services analysis for the design of regenerative built environments. Building Research & Information, 40(01), 54–64.