Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 17 results ...

Acheamfour, V K, Kissi, E and Adjei-Kumi, T (2019) Ascertaining the impact of contractors pre-qualification criteria on project success criteria. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(04), 618–32.

Aksorn, T and Hadikusumo, B H W (2008) Measuring effectiveness of safety programmes in the Thai construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 26(04), 21.

Cheung, F K T, Wong, M and Skitmore, M (2008) A study of clients' and estimators' tolerance towards estimating errors. Construction Management and Economics, 26(04), 349–62.

Forsythe, P J and Sepasgozar, S M (2019) Measuring installation productivity in prefabricated timber construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(04), 578–98.

Jayasinghe, R S, Rameezdeen, R and Chileshe, N (2019) Exploring sustainable post-end-of-life of building operations. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(04), 689–722.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Construction; Methodology; Supply chain management;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0969-9988
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2017-0148
  • Abstract:
    The purpose of this paper is to explore the synergies between post-end-of-life of building (PEoLB) concepts and operations to achieve sustainability. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted using 65 articles published between 2006 and 2017, and it has been subjected to descriptive and thematic analysis. Findings The descriptive analysis revealed that the majority of the articles were about (60 per cent) PEoLB operations, followed by (23 per cent) PEoLB concepts. Only 17 per cent of the articles have dealt with PEoLB-related strategic approaches. The thematic analysis elaborated on the literature development; interrelationships between PEoLB concepts and operations; impediments of introducing sustainability on these operations, remedial measures and information-based strategic approaches to achieve sustainability. Based on the findings, a conceptual framework for sustainable PEoLB operations is proposed. Furthermore, four areas of potential future research are discussed. Research limitations/implications This study presents a future research agenda including best practices to plan PEoLB operations and the development of optimisation models, risk management and information-based strategic approaches. Practical implications The proposed conceptual research framework triggers and nurtures potential pathways to introduce sustainable PEoLB operations under sound information flow. This could create a basis for future empirical studies in filling the identified gaps in literature. The framework could also assist practitioners in mitigating risks associated with transportation, storing and contamination of salvaged materials through enhanced information flow. In addition, the framework provides some managerial guidance to organisations seeking ways of establishing sustainability during reverse logistics (RL) operations. Originality/value This paper presents an SLR of an emerging area of research that encapsulates closed-loop supply chain through sustainable RL operations. The study highlights the interrelationships between PEoLB concepts and operations. It develops a robust approach to effectively manage the PEoLB operations underpinned by a sound information flow to facilitate sustainability.

Jha, K N and Devaya, M N (2008) Modelling the risks faced by Indian construction companies assessing international projects. Construction Management and Economics, 26(04), 337–48.

Kumaraswamy, M M and Dissanayaka, S M (1998) Linking procurement systems to project priorities. Building Research & Information, 26(04), 223–38.

Kyrö, R, Peltokorpi, A and Luoma-Halkola, L (2019) Connecting adaptability strategies to building system lifecycles in hospital retrofits. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(04), 633–47.

Lingard, H, Warmerdam, A and Shooshtarian, S (2019) Getting the balance right. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(04), 599–617.

Littlefair, P J (1998) Predicting lighting energy use under daylight linked lighting controls. Building Research & Information, 26(04), 208–22.

Luu, T-V, Kim, S-Y, Cao, H-L and Park, Y-M (2008) Performance measurement of construction firms in developing countries. Construction Management and Economics, 26(04), 373–86.

Mallasi, Z (2019) Designing with pixels: parametric thinking for patterning dynamic building facades. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(04), 668–88.

Mejlænder-Larsen, & (2019) A three-step process for reporting progress in detail engineering using BIM, based on experiences from oil and gas projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(04), 648–67.

Naderpajouh, N and Afshar, A (2008) A case-based reasoning approach to application of value engineering methodology in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 26(04), 363–72.

Toor, S-U-R and Ogunlana, S (2008) Problems causing delays in major construction projects in Thailand. Construction Management and Economics, 26(04), 395–408.

Wang, D, Fang, S and Li, K (2019) Dynamic changes of governance mechanisms in mega construction projects in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(04), 723–35.

Zou, Y and Lee, S-H (2008) The impacts of change management practices on project change cost performance. Construction Management and Economics, 26(04), 387–93.