Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 12 results ...
Duodu, B, Melagoda, D G and Rowlinson, S (2024) Innovation ambidexterity in construction firms: external knowledge antecedents and performance consequences. Construction Management and Economics, 42(06), 503–26.
Franz, B W and Olopade, J (2024) Exploring pathways to project success through project delivery team integration: a qualitative comparative analysis. Construction Management and Economics, 42(06), 564–81.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: Project delivery; project performance; team effectiveness; collaboration;
- ISBN/ISSN: 0144-6193
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2023.2289040
- Abstract:
Integration within project delivery teams can improve project outcomes in the building construction industry. However, integration across multiple firms and disciplines can be more challenging to manage, when compared to functionally organized, or siloed, teams. Given that resources to manage integration are limited and that most teams are only partially integrated in practice, this research seeks to explore pathways for their success. Using data collected from ten completed projects in the U.S., a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis was performed to identify which combinations of six dimensions of integration were sufficient for improved project performance. The analysis revealed six distinct and highly consistent pathways to success, as evaluated by the criteria of being on-budget, on-time, or achieving the planned sustainable certification. Across all pathways, having a single team focus and equitable team relationships were the only dimensions consistently found in pathways leading to desirable project outcomes. Other dimensions, such as co-location, seamless operation across organizational boundaries, and a no-blame culture were found in pathways to both desirable and undesirable project outcomes, depending on their combination with other dimensions. These results contribute to theories on implementing team integration, suggesting that fully integrated teams are not always necessary for success. Instead, integrated teams that can work collaboratively, while still maintaining organizational separation or autonomy, can be as effective. While the study does not enable the identification of all possible pathways to success, it provides guidance to practitioners by highlighting a small subset of pathways, giving greater flexibility in managing integration within their teams.
Gholipour, H F, Farzanegan, M R and Abu Al-Foul, M N (2024) House prices and labour productivity growth: Evidence from OECD countries. Construction Management and Economics, 42(06), 582–9.
Gunay, H B, O'Brien, W, Beausoleil-Morrison, I and Huchuk, B (2014) On adaptive occupant-learning window blind and lighting controls. Building Research & Information, 42(06), 739-56.
Lundgren, R, Kyrö, R and Olander, S (2024) The lifecycle impact and value capture of circular business models in the built environment. Construction Management and Economics, 42(06), 527–44.
Morgan, M and Cruickshank, H (2014) Quantifying the extent of space shortages: English dwellings. Building Research & Information, 42(06), 710-24.
Park, H, Meacham, B J, Dembsey, N A and Goulthorpe, M (2014) Integration of fire safety and building design. Building Research & Information, 42(06), 696-709.
Rovers, R (2014) New energy retrofit concept: ‘renovation trains’ for mass housing. Building Research & Information, 42(06), 757-67.
Short, C A, Noakes, C J, Gilkeson, C A and Fair, A (2014) Functional recovery of a resilient hospital type. Building Research & Information, 42(06), 657-84.
Signor, R, Love, P E D and Ballesteros-Pérez, P (2024) Detecting bid rigging in public auctions for procuring infrastructure projects: formulating the reference scenario for decision-making. Construction Management and Economics, 42(06), 545–63.
Stephan, A and Crawford, R H (2014) A comprehensive life cycle water analysis framework for residential buildings. Building Research & Information, 42(06), 685-95.
Stone, A, Shipworth, D, Biddulph, P and Oreszczyn, T (2014) Key factors determining the energy rating of existing English houses. Building Research & Information, 42(06), 725-38.