Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 20 results ...
Agyefi-Mensah, S, Kpamma, Z E and Hagan, D E (2022) Stair step geometry compliance with standard specifications for safety and usability: a study of selected university buildings in Ghana. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 40(01), 20-39.
Alipour-Bashary, M, Ravanshadnia, M, Abbasianjahromi, H and Asnaashari, E (2022) Building demolition risk assessment by applying a hybrid fuzzy FTA and fuzzy CRITIC-TOPSIS framework. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 40(01), 134-59.
Cole, R J (2012) Transitioning from green to regenerative design. Building Research & Information, 40(01), 39–53.
Cole, R J, Busby, P, Guenther, R, Briney, L, Blaviesciunaite, A and Alencar, T (2012) A regenerative design framework: setting new aspirations and initiating new discussions. Building Research & Information, 40(01), 95–111.
du Plessis, C (2012) Towards a regenerative paradigm for the built environment. Building Research & Information, 40(01), 7–22.
Ehwi, R J, Oti-Sarpong, K, Shojaei, R and Burgess, G (2022) Offsite Manufacturing Research: A Systematic Review of Methodologies Used. Construction Management and Economics, 40(01), 1–24.
Ekeskär, A, Havenvid, & I, Karrbom Gustavsson, T and Eriksson, P E (2022) Construction logistics in a multi-project context: coopetition among main contractors and the role of third-party logistics providers. Construction Management and Economics, 40(01), 25–40.
Faqih, F, Zayed, T and Alfalah, G (2022) Technology-based multi-tiered building diagnosis framework. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 40(01), 101-33.
Hamida, M B, Hassanain, M A and Al-Hammad, A M (2022) Review and assessment of factors affecting adaptive reuse of commercial projects in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 40(01), 1-19.
Hoxie, C, Berkebile, R and Todd, J A (2012) Stimulating regenerative development through community dialogue. Building Research & Information, 40(01), 65–80.
Inançoğlu, S and Uzunoglu, S S (2022) Transformation of social housing kitchens over time: Nicosia Göçmenköy social houses as a case study. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 40(01), 40-59.
Järvenpää, A, Eriksson, P E and Larsson, J (2022) Exploring a public client’s control systems in infrastructure projects from a relationship history perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 40(01), 56–71.
Mang, P and Reed, B (2012) Designing from place: a regenerative framework and methodology. Building Research & Information, 40(01), 23–38.
Nwadike, A N and Wilkinson, S (2022) Why amending building codes? An investigation of the benefits of regular building code amendment in New Zealand. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 40(01), 76-100.
Plaut, J M, Dunbar, B, Wackerman, A and Hodgin, S (2012) Regenerative design: the LENSES Framework for buildings and communities. Building Research & Information, 40(01), 112–22.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: buildings, design framework, design tools, LENSES, living environments, place, regenerative design, resource flows, sustainable design
- ISBN/ISSN: 0961-3218
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2012.619685
- Abstract:
Sustainability advocates see an immediate, pressing need to move beyond incremental improvements toward profound transformations on pressing economic, social and environmental issues. A framework called LENSES (Living Environments in Natural, Social, and Economic Systems) is presented that can address the type and scale of change necessary. This framework outlines a process to help communities and project teams create places where natural, social and economic systems can mutually thrive and prosper. LENSES is both a process and a metrics tool designed to help teams establish goals and to explore effectively relationships and interconnections in order to create restorative and regenerative places. The strength of LENSES lies in its ability to help groups consider concepts and elements often missing in other frameworks and tools such as inclusivity, financial sourcing, cultural resources, regional context, education, shared authority and governance, and on-going prosperity. LENSES provides a clear path to facilitate movement toward regenerative, place-based solutions in the built environment and beyond.
Simpeh, F and Adisa, S (2022) On-campus student accommodation safety measures: provision versus risk analysis. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 40(01), 60-75.
Styhre, A, Brorström, S and Gluch, P (2022) The valuation of housing in low-amenity and low purchasing power city districts: social and economic value entangled by default. Construction Management and Economics, 40(01), 72–86.
Svec, P, Berkebile, R and Todd, J A (2012) REGEN: toward a tool for regenerative thinking. Building Research & Information, 40(01), 81–94.
Svensson, I and Gluch, P (2022) Materiality in action: the role of objects in institutional work. Construction Management and Economics, 40(01), 41–55.
Zari, M P (2012) Ecosystem services analysis for the design of regenerative built environments. Building Research & Information, 40(01), 54–64.