Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 30 results ...
Anjomshoa, E (2024) Key performance indicators of construction companies in branding products and construction projects for success in a competitive environment in Iran. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(05), 2151-75.
Arora, M, Prakash, A, Mittal, A and Singh, S (2024) Examining the slow acceptance of HR analytics in the Indian engineering and construction industry: a SEM-ANN-based approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(05), 1973-93.
Aslam, M, Baffoe-Twum, E and Malik, S (2024) Benchmarking lean construction conformance in Pakistan’s construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(05), 2077-100.
Chan, I Y S and Chen, H (2024) Towards an integrative analysis of underground environment and human health: a survey and field measurement approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(05), 1807-34.
Cole-Colander, C (2003) Designing the Customer Experience. Building Research & Information, 31(05), 357–66.
Cong, W, Zhang, S, Liang, H and Xiang, Q (2024) Impact of challenge and hindrance job stressors on informal safety communication of construction workers in China: the moderating role of co-worker relationship. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(05), 2011-33.
Cooper, R, Bruce, M, Wootton, A, Hands, D and Daly, L (2003) Managing design in the extended enterprise. Building Research & Information, 31(05), 367–78.
Espinoza, D and Morris, J W F (2013) Decoupled NPV: a simple, improved method to value infrastructure investments. Construction Management and Economics, 31(05), 471-96.
Fazeli, A, Banihashemi, S, Hajirasouli, A and Mohandes, S R (2024) Automated 4D BIM development: the resource specification and optimization approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(05), 1896-922.
Fellows, R and Liu, A M M (2013) Use and misuse of the concept of culture. Construction Management and Economics, 31(05), 401-22.
Gann, D M, Salter, A J and Whyte, J K (2003) Design Quality Indicator as a tool for thinking. Building Research & Information, 31(05), 318–33.
Ghansah, F A, Lu, W and Ababio, B K (2024) Modelling the critical challenges of quality assurance of cross-border construction logistics and supply chain during the COVID-19 pandemic. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(05), 2128-50.
Gibson, E G and Gebken, R J (2003) Design quality in pre-project planning: applications of the Project Definition Rating Index. Building Research & Information, 31(05), 346–56.
Goh, Y M and Chua, D (2013) Neural network analysis of construction safety management systems: a case study in Singapore. Construction Management and Economics, 31(05), 460-70.
Guo, Y, Liu, J, Chen, C, Luo, X and Martek, I (2024) PPP project price mode typologies: a China-based comparative case study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(05), 2034-52.
Han, Y, Shen, J, Zhu, X, An, B and Bao, X (2024) Interaction mechanisms of interface management risks in complex systems of high-speed rail construction projects: an association rule mining-based modeling framework. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(05), 2101-27.
Hansen, K L and Vanegas, J A (2003) Improving design quality through briefing automation. Building Research & Information, 31(05), 379–86.
Hu, Y, Song, J and Zhao, T (2024) Evolutionary game analysis of the intelligent upgrading of smart solar photovoltaic projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(05), 1835-56.
Huang, W, Zhong, D and Chen, Y (2024) The relationship between construction workers’ emotional intelligence and safety performance. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(05), 2176-201.
Li, H, Chen, Y, Zheng, J, Fang, Y, Yang, Y, Skitmore, M, Rusch, R and Jiang, T (2024) The influence of the psychological contract on the safety of performance of construction workers in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(05), 1879-95.
Liao, L, Ye, Y, Wei, N, Li, H and Fan, C (2024) Exploring blockchain technology acceptance among non-managerial construction practitioners in Shenzhen, China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(05), 2053-76.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: construction; management; project management
- ISBN/ISSN:
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2023-0840
- Abstract:
Purpose: Problems such as information asymmetry and a lack of trust among construction practitioners damage the quality and progress of construction projects. The decentralization, transparency, traceability and temper-proof nature of blockchain technology (BCT) can provide solutions and facilitate multiparty cooperation. However, BCT acceptance in the construction industry is relatively low, and there are few pilot projects adopting BCT. Most relevant literature focuses on BCT acceptance at the industry and organizational levels, but the impact of non-managerial practitioners executing BCT or the traditional approach in day-to-day work tends to be disregarded. This study aims to establish a theoretical model of BCT acceptance, identify key influencing factors and paths of behavioral intention to adopt BCT and promote strategies to enhance BCT adoption. Design/methodology/approach: A new BCT acceptance model for construction practitioners was proposed. A survey was performed with 203 construction practitioners in Shenzhen, China and post-survey interviews were conducted with four BCT experts for validation. Covariance-based structural equation modeling was used to examine the influence paths and moderating effect analysis was performed to check practitioners’ differential perceptions. Findings: Performance expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions and perceived behavioral control significantly and positively influence behavioral intention to accept BCT, while impacts from effort performance and risk are negative. Overcoming obstacles related to the effort required for BCT adoption and effective risk management will be essential to unlocking BCT’s transformative potential. Then, the moderating effects of respondents’ gender, degree and BCT knowledge as well as the project type involved were analyzed. Continued adoption of BCT in the construction industry has the potential to revolutionize project management, transparency and trust among stakeholders. Research limitations/implications: The findings of this research can help practitioners and government agencies understand crucial influencing factors and pathways of BCT acceptance. Targeted measures, such as increasing practitioners’ benefits and sense of BCT usefulness, conducting pilot projects and increasing publicity, were proposed for project leadership teams to enhance BCT adoption. This may lead to increased efficiency, reduced disputes and more streamlined and secure construction processes, ultimately enhancing the industry’s overall performance. Originality/value: Few studies have explored BCT acceptance from the perspective of non-managerial construction practitioners. The BCT acceptance model proposed in this study is a novel adaptation of previous technology acceptance models, with new factors (risk and perceived behavioral control) and moderating variables (degree, BCT knowledge and project type) added for better understanding of non-managerial practitioners’ perceptions and differences. © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited.
Odeyinka, H A, Lowe, J and Kaka, A P (2013) Artificial neural network cost flow risk assessment model. Construction Management and Economics, 31(05), 423-39.
Onubi, H O, Carpio, M and Hassan, A S (2024) Job satisfaction in green construction projects: antecedent roles of green work climate, pro-environmental construction practice and green human capital. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(05), 1857-78.
Orr, S and Jadhav, A (2024) The effect of construction sustainability system interactions on financial performance: a sociotechnical perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(05), 1923-46.
Pinder, J, Iii, R S and Saker, J (2013) Stakeholder perspectives on developing more adaptable buildings. Construction Management and Economics, 31(05), 440-59.
Thomson, D S, Austin, S A, Devine-Wright, H and Mills, G R (2003) Managing value and quality in design. Building Research & Information, 31(05), 334–45.
Tiew, S Y (2024) Factors affecting performance of graduate architects in contract implementation management: a case study on housing projects in Malaysia. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(05), 1789-806.
Wang, D, Luo, J and Wang, Y (2024) Multifactor uncertainty analysis of prefabricated building supply chain: qualitative comparative analysis. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(05), 1994-2010.
Whyte, J K and Gann, D M (2003) Design Quality Indicators: work in progress. Building Research & Information, 31(05), 387–98.
Wu, X, Qian, Q and Zhang, M (2024) Impact of supervisor leadership on construction worker safety behavior in China: the moderating role of social capital. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(05), 1947-72.