Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 34 results ...

Al-Fadhali, N (2024) An AMOS-SEM approach to evaluating stakeholders' influence on construction project delivery performance. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 638-61.

Arbulu, R J, Tommelein, I D, Walsh, K D and Hershauer, J C (2003) Value stream analysis of a re-engineered construction supply chain. Building Research & Information, 31(02), 161–71.

Azman, M A, Abdul-Samad, Z, Lee, B L, Skitmore, M, Rajendra, D and Chuweni, N N (2024) How technological, environmental and managerial performance contribute to the productivity change of Malaysian construction firms. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 618-37.

Bai, L, Kang, S, Zhang, K, Zhang, B and Pan, T (2024) Modeling for external stakeholder risk assessment of project portfolios. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 737-66.

Ballard, G (2003) Lean project management. Building Research & Information, 31(02), 119–33.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: construction management; Lean Project Delivery System (LPDS) ; lean project management; project management; value; waste
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0961-3218
  • URL: http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/link.asp?id=d4qyebcmr8gjh0rp
  • Abstract:
    Projects are temporary production systems. When those systems are structured to deliver the product while maximizing value and minimizing waste, they are said to be 'lean' projects. Lean project management differs from traditional project management not only in the goals it pursues, but also in the structure of its phases, the relationship between phases and the participants in each phase. This paper presents a model of lean project management and contrasts lean and traditional approaches. Four tools or interventions are presented as illustrations of lean concepts in action.

Barlow, J, Childerhouse, P, Gann, D, Hong-Minh, S, Naim, M and Ozaki, R (2003) Choice and delivery in housebuilding: lessons from Japan for UK housebuilders. Building Research & Information, 31(02), 134–45.

Bygballe, L E, Håkansson, H and Jahre, M (2013) A critical discussion of models for conceptualizing the economic logic of construction. Construction Management and Economics, 31(02), 104-18.

Chang, C-Y (2013) A critical review of the application of TCE in the interpretation of risk allocation in PPP contracts. Construction Management and Economics, 31(02), 99-103.

Courtney, R and Winch, G M (2003) Re-engineering construction: the role of research and implementation. Building Research & Information, 31(02), 172–8.

Danel, T, Lafhaj, Z, Puppala, A, BuHamdan, S, Lienard, S and Richard, P (2024) Identifying tower crane activities with data: the case of the concrete pouring. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 939-56.

Deep, S, Gajendran, T, Jefferies, M, Uggina, V S and Patil, S (2024) Influence of subcontractors' “strategic capabilities” on “power”, “dependence” and “collaboration”: an empirical analysis in the context of procurement decisions. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 571-92.

Gerth, R, Boqvist, A, Bjelkemyr, M and Lindberg, B (2013) Design for construction: utilizing production experiences in development. Construction Management and Economics, 31(02), 135-50.

Gibb, A G F and Isack, F (2003) Re-engineering through pre-assembly: client expectations and drivers. Building Research & Information, 31(02), 146–60.

Gottlieb, S C and Haugbølle, K (2013) Contradictions and collaboration: partnering in-between systems of production, values and interests. Construction Management and Economics, 31(02), 119-34.

Green, S D and May, S (2003) Re-engineering construction: going against the grain. Building Research & Information, 31(02), 97–106.

Kim, S, Makhmalbaf, A and Shahandashti, M (2024) Diagnosing and quantifying post-COVID-19 fluctuations in the architecture billings indices. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 681-95.

Kwok, T W, Chang, S and Li, H (2024) Factors affecting unitized curtain wall system adoption for Hong Kong's high-rise residential buildings: a multi-stakeholder perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 526-43.

Leung, M Y, Ahmed, K and Famakin, I O (2024) Impact of mindfulness-based stress reduction intervention on the performance of construction professionals. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 662-80.

Li, C, Zhao, Y and Chen, W F (2024) Effects of commitment-based governance on the relationship between formal control and PPP projects performance: mediating and moderating. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 696-715.

Liao, L and Wu, Z (2024) Untangling the relationship between work pressure and emotions in social media: a quantitative empirical study of construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 767-88.

Liu, J, Wang, Z, Tang, J and Song, J (2024) The impact of the institutional environment of the host country on the perception of compliance risk of the international engineering contractor: the moderating effect of absorptive capacity. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 716-36.

Ma, T and Liu, Y (2024) Multiple paths to enhancing the resilience of project-based organizations from the perspective of CSR configuration: evidence from the Chinese construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 835-65.

Menches, C L and Chen, J (2013) Using ecological momentary assessment to understand a construction worker's daily disruptions and decisions. Construction Management and Economics, 31(02), 180-94.

Murphy, R (2013) Strategic planning in construction professional service firms: a study of Irish QS practices. Construction Management and Economics, 31(02), 151-66.

Nguyen, M V (2024) Corporate social responsibility performance and its effects on climate for innovation and opportunism: evidence from Vietnamese architectural design firms. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 812-34.

Nguyen, T T N, Do, S T, Nguyen, V T and Nguyen, T A (2024) Interrelationships among enabling factors for BIM adoption in construction enterprises. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 891-918.

Nor Azazi, N A, Shaed, M M, Samsurijan, M S and Ebekozien, A (2024) The influence of higher learning institutions in developing the experience economy from the perspective of the urban community. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 509-25.

Phua, F T T (2013) Construction management research at the individual level of analysis: current status, gaps and future directions. Construction Management and Economics, 31(02), 167-79.

Sohrabi, H and Noorzai, E (2024) Risk-supported case-based reasoning approach for cost overrun estimation of water-related projects using machine learning. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 544-70.

Su, L, Cao, Y, Li, H and Zhang, C (2024) Water environment treatment PPP projects optimal payment mechanism based on multi-stage dynamic programming model. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 866-90.

Winch, G M (2003) Integrated life-cycle analysis. Building Research & Information, 31(02), 107–18.

Zandee, D, Zutshi, A, Creed, A and Nijhof, A (2024) Aiming for bullseye: a novel gameplan for circular economy in the construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 593-617.

Zhang, N, Hwang, B G, Deng, X and Tay, F (2024) Exploring critical success factors for collaborative contracting implementation in the Singapore construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 919-38.

Zhu, J, Shi, Q, Zhang, C, Yuan, J, Li, Q and Wang, X (2024) Investigating cooperative strategies in low-carbon public–private partnership projects through evolutionary game. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(02), 789-811.