Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 30 results ...

Afful, A E, Ayarkwa, J, Acquah, G K K, Osei-Asibey, D and Osei Assibey, A A D (2023) Barriers to incorporation of indoor environmental quality (IEQ) principles into building designs. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(06), 2400-19.

Boyd, D and Bentley, D (2012) A critique of conceptions of design and management in construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 30(06), 441-54.

Bröchner, J, Josephson, P-E and Kadefors, A (2002) Swedish construction culture, quality management and collaborative practice. Building Research & Information, 30(06), 392–400.

Cevikbas, M and Işık, Z (2023) Detecting the most appropriate delay analysis methods for mega airport projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(06), 2463-80.

Durdyev, S, Koc, K, Karaca, F and Gurgun, A P (2023) Strategies for implementation of green roofs in developing countries. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(06), 2481-502.

Erman, E (2002) Timber joint design: the geometric breakdown method. Building Research & Information, 30(06), 446–69.

Fitriani, H and Ajayi, S (2023) Investigation of requisite measures for enhancing sustainable construction practices in Indonesia. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(06), 2602-20.

Gao, Q, Liu, B, Sun, J, Liu, C and Xu, Y (2023) Border-crossing frequencies of CO2 embodied in international trade of construction products for final demand. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(06), 2360-80.

Jennings, W (2012) Why costs overrun: risk, optimism and uncertainty in budgeting for the London 2012 Olympic Games. Construction Management and Economics, 30(06), 455-62.

Khatatbeh, A A (2023) Quantifying the impact of ISO 9001 standard on the project and engineering management and success factors; A case of construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(06), 2564-81.

Langston, C (2023) The empirical relationship between contractor success and project innovation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(06), 2231-54.

Lehtiranta, L, Kärnä, S, Junnonen, J-M and Julin, P (2012) The role of multi-firm satisfaction in construction project success. Construction Management and Economics, 30(06), 463-75.

Mohandes, S R, Durdyev, S, Sadeghi, H, Mahdiyar, A, Hosseini, M R, Banihashemi, S and Martek, I (2023) Towards enhancement in reliability and safety of construction projects: developing a hybrid multi-dimensional fuzzy-based approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(06), 2255-79.

Ofori, G (2002) Singapore's construction: moving toward a knowledge-based industry. Building Research & Information, 30(06), 401–12.

Olatunji, O A, Ramanayaka, C D E, Rotimi, F E and Rotimi, J O B (2023) Analysis of contractors' administrative characteristics in bid decision factors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(06), 2420-35.

Omar, H and Mahdjoubi, L (2023) Practical solutions for improving the suboptimal performance of construction projects using Dubai construction projects as an example. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(06), 2185-205.

Onubi, H O, Hassan, A S, Yusof, N and Bahdad, A A S (2023) Moderating effect of project size on the relationship between COVID-19 safety protocols and economic performance of construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(06), 2206-30.

Pietroforte, R and Miller, J B (2002) Procurement methods for US infrastructure: historical perspectives and recent trends. Building Research & Information, 30(06), 425–35.

Qiu, Y and Chen, H (2023) A systematic review of the knowledge domain of institutional theory in construction project management. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(06), 2523-44.

Reeves, K (2002) Construction business systems in Japan: general contractors and subcontractors. Building Research & Information, 30(06), 413–24.

Rwelamila, P D (2002) Creating an effective construction industry strategy in South Africa. Building Research & Information, 30(06), 435–45.

Shahid, M U, Thaheem, M J and Arshad, H (2023) Quantification and benchmarking of construction waste and its impact on cost – a case of Pakistan. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(06), 2304-33.

Shi, C, Chen, Y, Hua, Y and Tang, Y (2023) Understanding subcontracting organizational arrangements for construction projects in China: integrating capabilities and uncertainty. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(06), 2381-99.

Shi, Q, Zuo, J and Zillante, G (2012) Exploring the management of sustainable construction at the programme level: a Chinese case study. Construction Management and Economics, 30(06), 425-40.

Sodangi, M (2023) Towards attaining efficient joint ventures in international construction: the case of Saudi Arabia. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(06), 2545-63.

Tetteh, M O, Chan, A P C, Nani, G, Darko, A and Oppong, G D (2023) Impacts of management control mechanisms on the performance of international construction joint ventures: an empirical study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(06), 2280-303.

Xie, L L, Luo, Z and Zhao, X (2023) Critical factors of construction workers' career promotion: evidence from Guangzhou city. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(06), 2334-59.

Yuan, X X (2012) Bayesian method for the correlated competitive bidding model. Construction Management and Economics, 30(06), 477-91.

Zaman, U, Florez-Perez, L, Anjam, M, Ghani Khwaja, M and Ul-Huda, N (2023) At the end of the world, turn left: examining toxic leadership, team silence and success in mega construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(06), 2436-62.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: mega construction projects; project success; project team member's silence; toxic leadership
  • ISBN/ISSN:
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2021-0755
  • Abstract:

    Purpose: Failures in both followership and leadership become inevitable as mega construction projects are directed and controlled by toxic leaders. Consequently, team member’s desire for knowledge hoarding silence is triggered and goal alignment between the leader and team members suddenly fades away to realize success in mega projects. Considering the growing importance of these rarely examined constructs and fragmented literature on toxic leadership (TL), team silence and mega project success (PS) in the global construction industry, the present study aimed to examine the effects of TL and project team member’s silence (PTMS) on the success of mega construction projects. Moreover, the mediating influence of PTMS to link TL and mega construction PS has also been explored. Design/methodology/approach: Drawing on survey data of 326 project professionals directly associated with mega construction projects worth US$62bn under the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), the conceptual model was tested with covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) using Mplus program. Scales were adapted from previous research to measure TL (with its five-dimensions including abusive supervision, authoritarian leadership, self-promotion, narcissism and unpredictability), PS (with its three-dimensions including project management success, project ownership success and project investment success) and project team members’ silence. Reflective–formative second order assessments were specifically applied to measure the multi-dimensional nature of TL and PS, respectively. Findings: Mplus estimations revealed that TL negatively influences PS, besides forcing a culture of silence among project team members. Interestingly, the relationship between TL and PS is also negatively mediated by the PTMS. Research limitations/implications: The present study’s findings are derived from data of project professionals (N = 326) to examine success in megaprojects under the CPEC. Hence, these findings may be re-validated through future studies on similar megaprojects (e.g. China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) worth US$8tn) that may also be predicated by TL tendencies, silent cultures and high-stakes involved to seize PS. Practical implications: Policymakers, construction practitioners and other key stakeholders (e.g. departmental heads/supervisors) can take advantage of this new evidence to better interpret the success paradox in mega projects, and to reduce the spread and long-term damage of TL on team members and eventually create opportunities for PS. Originality/value: The present study’s novelty is manifested within this first empirical evidence on TL that breeds team silence in underperforming mega projects. Notably, present study offers alarming evidence on mega projects that can be easily derailed from success, as they continue to suffer from team silence and TL.

Zhang, H M, Chong, H Y, Zeng, Y and Zhang, W (2023) The effective mediating role of stakeholder management in the relationship between BIM implementation and project performance. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(06), 2503-22.