Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 35 results ...
Bai, L, Shi, H, Kang, S and Zhang, B (2023) Project portfolio risk analysis with the consideration of project interdependencies. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 647-70.
Bentivegna, V, Curwell, S, Deakin, M, Lombardi, P, Mitchell, G and Nijkamp, P (2002) A vision and methodology for integrated sustainable urban development: BEQUEST. Building Research & Information, 30(02), 83–94.
Cooper, I (2002) Transgressing discipline boundaries: is BEQUEST an example of 'the new production of knowledge'?. Building Research & Information, 30(02), 116–29.
Deakin, M, Huovila, P, Rao, S, Sunikka, M and Vreeker, R (2002) The assessment of sustainable urban development. Building Research & Information, 30(02), 95–108.
Dewlaney, K S and Hallowell, M (2012) Prevention through design and construction safety management strategies for high performance sustainable building construction. Construction Management and Economics, 30(02), 165-77.
El Hajj, C, Martínez Montes, G and Jawad, D (2023) Analysis of BIM functionalities diffusion in the construction industry: the case of the MENA region. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 415-35.
Hamilton, A, Mitchell, G and Yli-Karjanmaa, S (2002) The BEQUEST toolkit: a decision support system for urban sustainability. Building Research & Information, 30(02), 109–15.
Hui, E C-M, Lo, T K K, Chen, J and Wang, Z (2012) Housing and consumer markets in urban China. Construction Management and Economics, 30(02), 117-31.
Jiang, X, Sun, H, Lu, K, Lyu, S and Skitmore, M (2023) Using evolutionary game theory to study construction safety supervisory mechanism in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 514-37.
Jin, H, Liu, S, Li, J and Liu, C (2023) Determination of government guarantee and revenue cap in public–private partnership contracts. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 393-414.
Kohler, N (2002) The relevance of BEQUEST: an observer's perspective. Building Research & Information, 30(02), 130–8.
Li, H, Arditi, D and Wang, Z (2012) Transaction-related issues and construction project performance. Construction Management and Economics, 30(02), 151-64.
Li, H, Su, L, Zuo, J, An, X, Dong, G, Wang, L and Zhang, C (2023) The framework of data-driven and multi-criteria decision-making for detecting unbalanced bidding. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 598-622.
Liu, Y, Chang, R D, Zuo, J, Xiong, F and Dong, N (2023) What leads to the high capital cost of prefabricated construction in China: perspectives of stakeholders. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 805-32.
Macedo, B S and Ferreira, M L R (2023) Welder learning curves behaviour: “focus on welding productivity with the TIG process of marine platforms stainless steel pipes”. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 496-513.
Marandi Alamdari, A, Jabarzadeh, Y, Samson, D and Sanoubar, N (2023) Supply chain risk factors in green construction of residential mega projects – interactions and categorization. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 568-97.
Matto, M C (2023) Identifying the latent shortcomings of force account projects in Tanzania: the case of construction projects in the education sector. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 787-804.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: construction projects; education sector; force account; shortcomings; Tanzania
- ISBN/ISSN:
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-06-2021-0525
- Abstract:
Purpose: The study investigates the latent shortcomings of projects implemented under the force account approach. The study offers implications to the policymakers, practitioners and society at large for the effective and efficient application of the force account method in construction projects. Design/methodology/approach: The study adopted an explanatory sequential mixed method of which the quantitative data were collected first and then analysis was performed. Then, the results of quantitative data were used to plan for the collection of qualitative data. The quantitative data were collected from performance audit report while the qualitative data were collected using semi-structured interviews. Findings: The study identified six (6) general latent shortcomings and twenty-one (21) detailed latent shortcomings. The general latent shortcomings were inadequate planning and designing of the project; inappropriate adhering to the procurement procedures for materials; inadequate contract supervision; lack of qualified personnel to execute and supervise the works; lack of appropriate equipment and tools; and improper recording of cost of materials, labour and overheads in the books of accounts. Research limitations/implications: The research focused on the force account construction approach as applied in the Tanzania context. Practical implications: The research stresses that policymakers and practitioners are required to evaluate critically the scope and application of the force account mechanism. The force account procedures should be made based on the nature, scope, magnitude and thresholds of the project. The procuring organisations should ensure that the cost–benefit analysis is undertaken before implementing the force account projects. The findings of this study can be used as inputs to the present laws, regulations and guidelines related to the force account projects. Social implications: The present study has the potentials to the communities of which force account projects are undertaken. It stresses that the force account method offers employments opportunity to the social communities. Originality/value: The study has identified the latent shortcomings of the projects implemented under the force account method. This topic has received attention in Tanzania and developing countries. The study can be credited for its implications to policymakers, practitioners and communities including its emphasis on conducting a cost–benefit analysis.
Mohajeri, M, Ardeshir, A and Malekitabar, H (2023) Diagnostic intervention program based on construction workers' internal factors for persistent reduction of unsafe behavior. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 478-95.
Nguyen, H D, Do, Q N H and Macchion, L (2023) Influence of practitioners' characteristics on risk assessment in Green Building projects in emerging economies: a case of Vietnam. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 833-52.
Novieto, D T (2023) Safety climate and occupational safety behaviours: the mediating role of psychological ownership among construction professionals. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 853-68.
Pellegrino, R, Costantino, N, Pietroforte, R and Sancilio, S (2012) Construction of multi-storey concrete structures in Italy: patterns of productivity and learning curves. Construction Management and Economics, 30(02), 103-15.
Shoar, S, Yiu, T W, Payan, S and Parchamijalal, M (2023) Modeling cost overrun in building construction projects using the interpretive structural modeling approach: a developing country perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 365-92.
Sirimewan, D C, Samaraweera, A, Manjula, N H C, Rameezdeen, R, Rodrigo, M N N and Ekanayake, E M A C (2023) Strategies for sustainable irrigation system management: a socio-technical system approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 436-55.
Tijani, B, Jin, X and Osei-Kyei, R (2023) Theoretical model for mental health management of project management practitioners in architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) project organizations. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 914-43.
Tong, R, Wang, L, Cao, L, Zhang, B and Yang, X (2023) Psychosocial factors for safety performance of construction workers: taking stock and looking forward. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 944-62.
Vahabi, A, Nasirzadeh, F and Mills, A (2023) Assessing the impact of project brief clarity using project definition rating index tool and system dynamic. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 697-713.
Vigneshwar, R V K and Shanmugapriya, S (2023) Investigating the factors affecting construction site productivity – a case of India. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 963-85.
Wakchaure, S S and Jha, K N (2012) Determination of bridge health index using analytical hierarchy process. Construction Management and Economics, 30(02), 133-49.
Wang, C, Zou, F, Yap, J B H, Wood, L C, Li, H and Ding, L (2023) System dynamics tool for entropy-based risk control on sleeve grouting in prefabricated buildings. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 538-67.
Wang, D and Wang, Y (2023) The role of regulatory focus and team mindfulness in megaproject conflicts. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 714-33.
Wang, G, Locatelli, G, Zhang, H, Wan, J and Chen, Y (2023) Playing the cards right: exploring the way leadership influences organizational citizenship behavior for the environment in megaprojects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 623-46.
Xiao, H and Hao, S (2023) Public participation in infrastructure projects: an integrative review and prospects for the future research. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 456-77.
Xu, S, Zhang, M, Xia, B and Liu, J (2023) Exploring construction workers' attitudinal ambivalence: a system dynamics approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 671-96.
Yu, A T W, Mok, K S H and Wong, I (2023) Minimisation and management strategies for refurbishment and renovation waste in Hong Kong. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 869-88.
Yuan, M, Li, Z, Li, X, Luo, X, Yin, X and Cai, J (2023) Proposing a multifaceted model for adopting prefabricated construction technology in the construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(02), 755-86.